June 24, 2008

Legislative Lowdown: Forced Annexation Continues

The tortuous route of the moratorium on forced annexation in North Carolina took another agonizing step today when the House Judiciary II Committee again to hear the bill.  At the last meeting on Thursday, June 19th, the Chairman, former Speaker of the House Dan Blue (D-Wake) waited until the end of the meeting to take up the bill and time ran out before a vote could be taken.  Annexation opponents had counted votes and figured they had a good chance to win vote.  When today's meeting began, the room was packed with even more victim's of forced annexation from Moore, Rowan Wake and Johnston Counties.

After hearing from the NC League of Municipalities General Counsel, Andy Romanet make the offer to negotiate with lawmakers in order to avoid a moratorium, Reps. Larry Brown (R-Forsyth) and Bruce Goforth (D-Buncombe) both stated that the League's offer to negoiate was just that: an offer.

Rep. Blue then began to slowly propose some sort of settlement between the sides that both may find agreeable.  One of his proposals was to punish cities that annex residents without providing services in a timely manner by having the residents taxes withhold from the offending city.

Annexation opposition leader Doug Aiken countered by telling the committee that cities that abuse the annexation process may be adhering to the letter of the law but the law itself is flawed to begin with and needs to be changed.

In the end, despite efforts by Reps. Joe Kiser (R-Lincoln) and Tim Moore (R-Cleveland) to make motions to vote on the bill, Blue announced that he planned to continue the meeting in the future and hoped to offer an amendment that addressed his prior concern.

Annexation proponents should consider the moritorium the least damaging proposal to their position.  Should the moritorium fail this session, it has the potential to become a tsunami of citizen activism next session that could result in an end to forced annexation altogether in the Old North State.

January 16, 2008

More on Raleigh Spending Priorities

WRAL has a story that talks about the high turnover of Raleigh police officers and mentions the fact that there are 58 vacancies on the police force.

So why then, is Raleigh spending $1 million to spruce up a restaurant downtown while police officers quit over low pay?  Apparently, the Mayor of Raleigh places a higher priority on having a fancy place to eat in his beloved downtown than ensuring the safety of his city's residents.

How many police officers could have been hired for $1 million?  Or retained from resigning by a new pay structure?

Maybe if the Mayor got out of his Ivory Tower, he'd notice that there has been 3 homicides in Raleigh already this year.  Hmm... wonder if filling those 58 police vacancies might do something about the crime rate.

Rome may be burning, but Meeker will sit idly by and fiddle at his lovely new amphitheater next to his lovely new convention center, down the newly reopened Fayetteville Street from his lovely new white table cloth fancy restaurant.

Priorities matter.  It's time to hold Raleigh's leaders accountable for theirs.

December 13, 2007

Parton Theater: Lawyers only real winners as taxpayers go on Paying!

Taxpayers need to follow the money while the Randy Parton Theater meltdown happens.  We now have our three law firms feeding at the public trough.  Don Carrington keeps reporting on the travails of Roanoke Rapids and the floundering Parton Theater with his latest Dolly Speaks Out to Support Brother story detailing the hiring of Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice to represent the city of Roanoke Rapids in this dispute.  Carrington had already reported that Ernest Pearson, a lawyer with the Sanford Holshouser law firm, has signed checks from funds advanced by the city to his own firm. And let us not forget that Randy Parton has a lawyer from the firm Poyner & Spruill LLP representing him. Since Parton was given a very large sum from the city up front and they have already forgiven him a $475,000 advance - taxpayers are really the ones footing his legal bill in the end.

Let's look at this again:

  • Parton yearly artist fee - $1.5 million
  • public money invested in a risky scheme- $21 million
  • Lawyers continuing to make money - Priceless

As has been said many times, follow the money.